Music is one of the few art forms that is able to
cross social, economic, and historical barriers to be embraced by people of all
kinds in all eras. Although nearly every emotion, passion, and desire can be
found within the notes of music, the most common musical theme is love. This
week’s film explores the obsessive love between a composer and his music that
is carried over to a dangerous extent to his muse. Through a combination of
lavish atmosphere, genuine emotion, and unforgettable songs 2004’s The Phantom of the Opera is a fitting
ode to the power, enchantment, and seduction of music.
If nothing else, the man does have lakefront property |
The story begins during an auction at the fictional
Opera Populaire in 1919 Paris. During the auction, Viscount Raul de Chagny
(Patrick Wilson) purchases a mysterious music box and hints at the box’s
relation to some unspecified tragedy. The auctioneer then moves on to the sale
of the opera house’s chandelier that caused an infamous fire in 1870. With that
sale, Raul reflects upon his experiences at the opera house in the distant days
of its glory, launching a flashback that lasts for the majority of the film. The
flashback brings the story back to 1870 as Raul, then a new patron of the opera
house, sits in on rehearsal for an upcoming production. The rehearsal ushers in
several drastic changes as the owner (James Fleet) announces his stress-induced
retirement, the theater’s new owners arrive (Ciaran Hinds and Simon Callow),
and the reigning primadonna (Minnie Driver) walks out after a nearly fatal
accident, only to be replaced by an unexpectedly talented chorus girl. The
chorus girl, Christine (Emmy Rossum), is revealed to be a musical prodigy from
a family of prominent musicians and Raul’s former childhood sweetheart.
Christine’s debut in the lead role makes her an overnight success and prompts
Raul to rekindle their acquaintance. He soon learns, however, that she is still
haunted by the death of her father years earlier and is fixated upon her visits
from the supposed ‘angel of music’. While Raul brushes off her visitor as
childish make-believe, Christine’s angel makes an appearance that night and is
revealed to be a less than heavenly presence. The ‘angel’ is actually the
mysterious figure known as the ‘phantom of the opera’ (Gerard Butler), a masked
man whose facial deformities have forced him to find refuge in the catacombs
beneath the opera house. The phantom then confesses his love for her and
reveals that it was his sabotage of the previous primadonna that led to
Christine being cast in the production.
Although flattered by his attentions, the phantom’s violent temper and
escalating obsession with her leads her to question where her loyalties lie.
Torn between the tormented genius of the phantom and the stable comfort of
Raul, she is ultimately forced to find her own voice at the risk of her career,
freedom, and even her life.
Although stage productions are often difficult to
translate to the screen, The Phantom of
the Opera makes an almost seamless transition. The film utilizes a set that is largely
faithful to the original designs for the stage production and underscores the
story’s themes by juxtaposing the isolated refinement of the phantom and the
garish luxury of the world of the opera house. The set and costumes also
succeed at placing the story within a specific time and place, which allows the
almost otherworldly events of the plot to remain grounded within the limits of
its historical setting. The film also succeeds at conveying its story through
equal parts acting and song; a feat which too many musicals have failed to
accomplish. The cast is derived primarily from film, and as a result all of the
actors are able to portray their characters with a complexity and subtlety that
ensures the story remains engaging and believable. Perhaps even more crucially,
each of the central players possess the musical ability to sing their roles in
such a way that does complete justice to composer Andrew Lloyd Webber’s iconic
score, and could win over even the most devoted fans of the original stage
show. Through the skill of the cast and crew, the film remains remarkably
balanced and conveys its tortured romance without either the acting, visuals,
or music ever upstaging the plot.
Decisions, decisions... |
Despite the inherent risks in bringing a much loved
stage production to the screen, The Phantom of the Opera actually succeeds in
areas that the original show fell flat. In the stage show, the phantom is an
enigmatic character whose motivations remain murky throughout the plot. While
this ambiguity provides excellent tension early on, it becomes frustrating as
the story progresses and leaves the phantom’s internal struggles lacking and
emotional core. Similarly, Christine’s fixation upon the phantom is initially explained
by her grief over her father’s death, but there is little explanation for her
continued interest in the phantom after his identity is revealed. Because film
is a more intimate medium that lends itself to internal conflict within its
characters, the film is able to develop the motivations of both of its leads in
a way that lends credibility to their gothic romance. Rather than merely disfigured,
the phantom is revealed to have suffered abuse and neglect when he was forced
to perform in a freak show as a child. The humiliation and degradation that he
endured in his childhood has clearly left his psyche just as scarred as his
face, and led him to harbor a bitter antagonism against society and its
hypocrisy. Similarly, Christine’s attraction to the phantom is found to be
rooted in their shared status as social outsiders. As a result, she is able to
let her guard down and reveal the aspects of herself to the phantom that she
would never dare show to anyone else. Through his mentoring and efforts to
promote her career, phantom also represents the unknown and her future as an
artist whereas her relationship with Raul is still relegated to nostalgia for
her past. Thus, Christine’s central struggle is not just between the two men in
her life but also between her past and present just as the phantom’s quest to
win Christine is one part of his greater quest to win acceptance as an artist
and member of society. Through these script additions, the film adds more depth
and detail to the beloved story in a way that makes the film both an excellent
companion piece to the stage production and exhilarating stand-alone experience.
Through its combination of fascinating script,
eye-catching costumes, dazzling effects, and soaring songs, The Phantom of the Opera is a piece that
holds appeal for filmgoers and theatergoers alike. In its exploration of
romance and social ostracism the film relates the power of music to redeem and
transport us even within our darkest moments. The superb performances, and intimate
direction brings the story to life in a way that makes the film equally as
spectacular as its stage predecessor. This film is a must see for fans of
excellent story-telling, romance, theater, and of course, the music of the
night.
Nothing a little plastic surgery and psychiatric therapy couldn't cure |
How well do you think this one holds up to Universal Studios "The Phantom of the Opera" w/ Lon Chaney from the 1920's???
ReplyDeleteThat's a tough call because they're really two different genres; the 2004 version is a musical romance whereas the 1920's version is faithful to the book's mystery format and focuses more on the horror aspect than the romance. Both are great movies in my book, maybe I'll do a comparison of several cinema phantoms one of these days...
ReplyDelete