Classics: A Review of The Talented Mr. Ripley By Lauren Ennis

Is it better to be a real nobody or a false somebody? It is this seemingly simple question that drives the 1999 thriller The Talented Mr. Ripley. Adapted from the 1955 novel of the same name, the film follows a working class young man as he uses his unusual talents to enter 1950's cafe society and the fatal lengths at which he will go to remain there. At once a subtle character study and a Hitchcockian thriller this twisted tale of the American Dream gone wrong is simply to die for.

A portrait of the sociopath as a young social-climber

The story begins with struggling pianist Tom Ripley (Matt Damon) filling in for another musician at a society gala. After the performance tycoon shipping tycoon Herbert Greenleaf (James Rebhorn) mistakes Tom for an acquaintance of his son, Princeton alum turned playboy Dickie. When Tom fails to correct the error Mr. Greenleaf offers to pay Tom to travel to the glamorous Italian Riviera and retrieve the errant Dickie (Jude Law). Tom eagerly seizes the opportunity, but upon arriving is immediately swept up into Dickie's world of fast living and easy money. As the summer draws to a close, however, both Tom's funds and Dickie's friendship are stretched to their limits. Determined not to give up his new lifestyle Tom concocts a scheme that puts his talents to the ultimate test.

Although the film's plot maintains the usual twists and turns of a thriller the film sets itself apart by relating its sordid story of money and manipulation from the villain's perspective. From the outset, Tom is portrayed as cunning, manipulative, and opportunistic; hardly qualities of a likeable protagonist. As the story unfolds, however, viewers experience the world through Tom's eyes and his desire for self-improvement and manipulation become understandable even as his actions escalate to the reprehensible. As a result, audiences are placed in the uncomfortable position of empathizing with a character that they would ordinarily condemn. This perspective lends the proceedings an additional layer of suspense as audiences become emotionally invested in Tom's fate as well as the grim fates of those around him. Less a tale of who done it than why was it done, film raises fundamental questions about identity, success, and society all while weaving a web of deception that will leave viewers guessing until its final frame.

The moment when three becomes a crowd

The world of Tom Ripley in all its gruesomeness and glamour is vividly brought to life by the talented cast. Jude Law charmingly portrays the equal parts carefree and careless Dickie. Gwenyth Paltrow turns in a dynamic performance as Dickie's fiance as she captures Marge's party gilr persona while hinting at the depth that Tom underestimates. Jack Davenport earns sympathy as Tom's deceived love interest, Peter. Philip Seymour Hoffman and Cate Blanchett steal each scene in which they appear as Dickie's charismatic best friend, Freddie, and witty socialite Meredith. Matt Damon proves himself every bit as talented as Tom Ripley as he conveys the easy charm, inner torment, and desperate drive that define the elusive Tom.

The adventures of Tom Ripley make for a thought provoking thriller that will leave viewers questioning even themselves. Through its intricate plot, intelligent script and superior performances the film relates a masterful tale of classic suspense. For a guaranteed thrill ride join the scheming, social climbing, and sociopathic but ever talented Mr. Ripley.

Any requests?

Classics: Three Modern Movies to Cure Your Classic Film Craving By Lauren Ennis

Over the course of the last century cinema has become one of the surest signs of the times through its ability to act as a visual chronicle of changes in fashion, technology, and social norms. Films have related stories that explore a myriad of social and political issues as well as all of the conflicts and emotions of the human experience. In spite of the ways in which cinema brings people together, film fans remain divided as many movie buffs maintain a firm focus upon modern releases while others cling to the classics. Fortunately for film fans everywhere, a number of recent releases have combined the magic of movies past and present to create a uniquely universal viewing experiences that truly have something for everyone.

Move over Fred and Ginger

La La Land: After experiencing a decline in popularity during the 1960's, movie musicals were back on the cinematic map starting in the early 2000's. While the majority of these modern musical films subverted and added twists to the genre, 2016's La La Land used classic musical conventions to tell a thoroughly modern tale. the story follows an aspiring actress and struggling jazz musician (Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling) as they follow the road to both romance and stardom in modern L.A. Even as the couple navigate the pitfalls of life and love in contemporary Tinseltown, they still sing and dance their way into audiences' hearts in a style befitting Ginger Rogers and Fred Astaire. Whether they are sharing a fantasy dance sequence worthy of Gene Kelly or singing jazzy tunes that would be at home in The Umbrellas of Cherbourg, the film's leading couple exude classic cool. The film even includes references to a diverse array of classic films ranging from Funny Face to Jules and Jim. Wile the film pays apt tribute to cinema history, La La Land remains firmly planted in the fast paced and fickle world of modern showbiz. In this way, the film tells a universal tale of the struggle to find love and success that will resonate with audiences of any generation. For a timeless story tat is guaranteed to get your toes tapping pay a visit to La La Land.

Sometimes words just get in the way

The Artist: Cinema's silent era reached its end with the rise of talking pictures in the late 1920's...or did it? In 2012 moviegoers partied like it was 1929 with the release of the surprise critical and commercial hit The Artist. Filmed in glorious black and white with just one line of dialogue, The Artist that a picture is worth a thousand words even in the new millennium. The film chronicles the parallel careers of a fading silent star (Jean Dujardin) and the budding 'talkie' starlet who loves him (Berenice Bejo). The film poignantly explores the struggles of silent stars at the dawn of the sound era with an eye towards the fleeting nature of fame in an industry that is always on the lookout for the next big thing. The vintage cinematography combined with eye-catching costumes and sets transports viewers to the razzle dazzle of the roaring twenties. Simultaneously the intelligent script and nuanced performance ensure that the film has just enough of a modern feel to engage today's viewers. At once a contemporary commentary on aging and celebrity and a celebration of classic cinema The Artist is a silent film with a lot to say.

Round up the usual suspects!

The Good German: Film noir is a genre that while difficult to define is easy to recognize and tempting to imitate. Decades after the genre's heyday in the 1940's and 1950's, studios around the glob have continued to release films that showcase a dark sensibility and grim charm that is directly reminiscent of classic noir. The 2006 film The Good German takes its homage to noir a step further and relates its gritty post-war tale of greed, corruption, and betrayal using authentic post-war production values. The film follows a Humphrey Bogart-esque American war correspondent (George Clooney) as he searches for a former flame (Cate Blanchett) amidst the wreckage of post-war Berlin. The closer that he comes to reuniting with his lost love, however, the further that he is drawn into a convoluted web of state secrets, war crimes, and murder. The film accurately portrays the desperation of a haunted post-war Europe with an added grit that would have been strictly verboten under the restrictions of noir era censors. As a result, the film is able to explore such issues as sexual exploitation, post-war poverty, and the horrors of Nazi Germany with a frankness that films like Casablanca and The Third Man could only hint at. In this way, the film captures both the dark spirit of noir and the bleak reality that fueled it. For a Valentine to vintage noir guaranteed to thrill modern audiences, make a date with The Good German.

Classics: A Review of Camille By Lauren Ennis

What is love worth? Is its value so great that it can compensate for the loss of one's social standing, family, friends, and even one's physical well-being? Or is it just one more thing to be measured in dollars and cents? These are the questions that lie at the heart of the 1937 romantic drama Camille. Adapted from the play of the same name, which was in turn adapted from the novel La Dame Aux Camelias, the film chronicles the doomed romance between a consumptive courtesan and her naive young suitor. After numerous retellings this film remains the best remembered and one of the best renditions of the timeless tale of love, loss, and redemption.

Positively swoon worthy

The story begins in 1800's Paris as the always generous and ever in debt courtesan Marguerite Gautier (Greta Garbo)searches for a new patron. While at the opera a fellow courtesan arranges for Marguerite to meet Baron de Varville (Henry Daniell), whose fortune could easily finance her mounting debts and medical bills. Fate intervenes, however, when she mistakes handsome young Armand Duvall for the Baron. Although the two are immediately drawn to one another, she refuses Armand's attentions and begins an affair with the more financially stable Baron. The pair are eventually reunited, however, and Marguerite realizes that the Baron's wealth cannot fill the void in her life. She then retreats the the country with Armand for an idyllic summer during which happiness finally appears within her reach. The couple are not able to hold reality at bay forever, however, and soon find themselves haunted by the same social pressures and threat of illness that they had fled in Paris. Events are then set in motion that determine the fates of both Marguerite and Armand.

The film sets itself apart from many other romantic dramas through its realistic portrayal of romance. while many romances present flawless couples overcoming overwhelming odds, Camille idealizes neither its protagonists nor the circumstances surrounding their relationship. From the outset, Marguerite and Armand are faced with such hazards as jealousy, financial difficulties, to insecurity, and physical illness; all of which are problems which couples continue to face today. both are also shown to be grappling with their own flaws as Marguerite struggles to overcome her bitter cynicism while Armand tries to conquer his jealousy. As a result, the pair, while likeable, are also all too relateable. The film also makes no attempt to glamorize Marguerite's profession, instead focusing upon the emotional, social, and physical toll that life as a courtesan has taken upon her. The story even extends its realism a step further by showing the ways in which her past threaten not only her own hopes for the future but Armand's as well.  As a result, the film presents a balanced view of its romance which, while idealistic and passionate, remains firmly grounded in a less than ideal reality. It is this same realism that elevates Camille beyond the confines of a standard period romance to the universal tale of self-sacrifice, and redemption that continues to resonate today.

The by turns glittering and gritty world of nineteenth century Paris is vividly brought to life by the exemplary work of the cast. Lenore Ulric perfectly captures the spitefulness of Marguerite's chief rival, viperish courtesan Olympe. Laura Hope Crews, in a stark departure from her more famous role as prudish Aunt Pittypatt in Gone With the Wind, is hilariously vulgar in her performance as aging courtesan Prudence. Jessie Ralph and Rex O'Malley are endearing in their roles as Marguerite's dedicated maid, Nanine, and Armand's playboy best friend, Gaston. Lionel Barrymore and Henry Daniell turn in complex performances as the calculating Baron and Armand's disapproving father. Contemporary reviews called Greta Garbo the greatest Camille since Sarah Bernhardt and it is easy to see why. Garbo brings the Marguerite of the original novel to the screen with all of her contradictions fully intact. Throughout her layered performance she shifts from Marguerite's carefree and mercenary persona to her damaged but still idealistic true self without striking a false note. Similarly, Robert Taylor turns in a performance that equals his leading lady's as he conveys Armand's naivete and devotion without allowing himself to be reduced to a secondary love interest or plot device. Together, the two light up the screen with a dazzling chemistry and raw emotion that places them among the most memorable pairings in cinematic history.

Greta Garbo's first talking picture, Anna Christie, was released with the tagline "Garbo Talks!"; Camille could have been billed with the tagline "Garbo Transcends". Through the performances of Garbo, Taylor, and the rest of the stellar cast and an intelligent script Camille puts the classic in classic Hollywood. Join Greta Garbo and Robert Taylor for an affair to remember in Camille.

Classics: A Review of Vice Principals By Lauren Ennis

The backpacks are out and the buses are in gear; it must be that back to school time of year. To commemorate this bane to teachers and students everywhere I'll be turning the spotlight not on teachers or students but school administrations. To honor those unsung hallway heroes I'll be reviewing the hit HBO comedy series Vice Principals. Easily one of the most outrageously funny things on television the series sends up all things high school with enough shenanigans of its own to ensure that it more than makes the grade.

Setting an example

The story begins with vice principals and polar opposites Neal Gamby (Danny McBride) and Lee Russell (Walton Goggins) vying for the position of principal following the retirement of their boss. Misanthropic Gamby assumes that his years of experience will guarantee him the position while charismatic Russell relies upon his con-man's charm to lead him to victory. Both are shocked, however, when they learn that neither of them will become principal, and the school board instead hired district outsider Doctor Belinda Brown (Kimberly Hebert Gregory). Confronted with an adversary that neither can conquer alone Gamby and Russell form an unholy alliance that marks the beginning of a hilarious if not exactly beautiful friendship.

After decades of draining high school dramas, Vice Principals' darkly comedic approach earns the series an 'A' for originality. Through the over the top hijinks of Gamby, Russell, and company the series aptly captures the modern public school system at its most absurd. From the inefficiencies of PBIS, to easily outmaneuvered standardized tests, to school spirit run amok, nothing in the school system is safe from the script's scathing wit. even in the midst of its wonderfully warped plot the series greatest strength lies within its characters which allow the script to subvert such tired stock types as the overzealous dean, the charismatic 'cool' teacher, and out of touch Vice Principal and transform them into the stuff of comedy gold. With an anarchic spirit that gleefully tramples over every rule of political correctness the series breathes new life into dusty classroom cliches and sets a new standard for school comedy.

Through two seasons the series delivers countless laughs thanks to the expert work of its cast. Susan Park earns sympathy in her role as Russell's put upon wife, Christine, while Busy Philipps is appropriately snarky as Gamby's ex-wife. Maya G Love and Shea Wigham are endearing in their portrayals of Gamby's awkward teen daughter and his ex-wife's too good to be true new husband. Georgia King personifies the girl next door as idealistic English teacher Amanda Snodgrass. June Kyoto Lu is a force of nature as Russell's viscous mother-in-law, Mi-Cha. Edi Patterson is pure dynamite as unstable math teacher, Miss Abbott. Kimberly Hebert Gregory portrays Doctor Brown with a charisma and comedic timing that ensure she is every bit Gamby and Russell's match. Even in the midst of stellar supporting performances, the series belongs to Danny McBride and Walton Goggins as Gamby and Russell. McBride is riotous in his turn as socially inept curmudgeon Gamby and the perfect foil to Goggins' hilarious performance as charming sociopath Russell. Together, the two form a pairing to rival the greatest of comedy duos.

Part buddy comedy and part school satire, Vice Principals is one hundred percent wickedly witty. Through its uproarious script and expertly comedic performances the series is guaranteed to have students and teachers laughing their way into a new school year. For a lesson in comedy join Gamby and Russell in Vice Principals.

Classics: A Review of the Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society By Lauren Ennis

Throughout the ages stories have brought people together, even as everything around them threatens to tear them apart. In the recently released The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society, it is the shared passion for books that binds a local club together and provides them with strength and solace as they endure enemy occupation. Over the course of the film, the characters find friendship, love, courage, and redemption all between the covers of the books that they share with one another. The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society, is an uplifting tale of the importance of stories and the power that they hold when we share them with one another.

I don't think we're at Downton anymore, Toto

The story begins with writer Juliet Ashton (Lily James) enjoying literary success in post-World War II London. Despite her new found wealth and commercial popularity, however, she yearns to write something serious that will address the war-time traumas that she and those around her continue to cope with. she soon finds a kindred spirit with the arrival of a chance letter from Dawsey Adams (Michiel Huisman), a pig farmer living on the island of Guernsey and fellow book lover. Inspired by the tales of her new pen pal's struggles during the German occupation of Guernsey she travels to the island with the hope of meeting Dawsey and the colorful members of his local book club, the Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society. Upon arriving she is dismayed by the guarded reception she receives from the society and the ways in which the island remains haunted by the impact of war. In an effort t shed light upon the trials and resilience of the people of Guernsey she resolves to write about the occupation. During her research she stumbles upon the disappearance of the society's founding member, Elizabeth McKenna (Jessica Findlay Brown). As she becomes embroiled in the mystery surrounding Elizabeth's disappearance Juliet becomes drawn into the lives of Elizabeth's fellow society members, in whom she finds a community of both fellow book lovers and fellow survivors. By the end of her visit Juliet learns invaluable lessons in life, love, and literature that allow her to move forward with a life in which she neither forgets the toll of war nor allows herself to be defined by it.

Through its portrayal of the fictional Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society, the film showcases the all too real tragedy of the occupation of Guernsey while reminding us all of the universal power of books to shed light even in the darkest of times. Through the experiences of its eclectic cast of characters the film explores both the immediate and lasting effects of World War II in England ranging from poverty and wreckage to broken families and shattered lives. While the film conveys the horrors of both the London blitz and the occupation of Guernsey the script remains firmly focused upon not upon the atrocities committed by the Nazis but instead upon the resilience and courage of the British people. As a result, the film acts not as a bleak chronicle of the traumas of war, but instead as an inspiring testament to the ability of the human spirit to rise above that trauma.

Now that's my idea of a book club!

The film also compellingly relates the power of books. For both Londoner Juliet and the residents of Guernsey books provide a refuge and a community. During the war both Juliet and the society look to literature for an escape from the outside world that is crumbling all around them. It is within the pages of books that they each find the hope, strength, and courage to carry on. For the society, books also provide a crucial sense of camaraderie and community amidst the isolation of occupation, which continues to bring them together after the war. It is this same community spirit that draws Juliet out of her solitude in London. Through the simple act of enjoying and sharing stories each of the characters is able to sustain their own inner light while inspiring one another to stand in solidarity against the darkness surrounding them. At once a tribute to the resilience of one group of people in the face of war and a universal tale of the power of literature, The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society is an inspiring story to share with your own community.

The film brings the best-selling novel it is based upon to vibrant life through the uniformly excellent performances of its ensemble cast. Lily James personifies loveliness as she aptly captures Juliet's warmth and intelligence. Michiel Huisman makes for an admirable hero as morally upright and self-sacrificing Dawsey. Jessica Findlay Brown is nothing short of inspiring as the passionate and courageous Elizabeth. Penelope Wilton movingly conveys the toll of war as the steely but damaged Amelia. Tom Courtenay and Katherine Parkinson are delightful in their comic turns as irreverent Eben and eccentric Isola.

The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society is compelling testament to the power of sharing both written and personal stories to bring and keep people together even in the most adverse of circumstances. A historical film with lessons that hold resonance today, the film takes viewers onto an enlightening journey into the hearts of its characters. Through an intelligent and emotionally resonant script and superb performances, the film weaves a masterful tale tat will remain with viewers long after the final credits fade. For an uplifting journey with inspiration to spare, enroll in The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society.

Classics: A Review of Lust for Life By Lauren Ennis

One of popular culture’s most enduring images is that of the tormented artist. As a result, it comes as little surprise that one of Hollywood’s best biographies chronicles the life of one of the most iconic tortured artists; nineteenth century painter Vincent van Gogh. Famous for his art and infamous for his struggles with mental illness, van Gogh’s tragic life is brilliantly brought to the screen in the 1956 Oscar winning film Lust for Life. A true feast for the eyes, Lust for Life is at once a testament to the artistic spirit and an apt portrait of one of the men who personified it.

Now where have I seen that face before?

The film begins not with van Gogh’s art, but instead with his early efforts to resist becoming an artist. After suffering a humiliating failure when he attempts to follow in his clergyman father’s footsteps as a minster he finally becomes determined to serve humanity through his art. The film then chronicles his efforts to establish himself as a painter and his introduction to the dazzling world of the belle époque art scene. As his skill on the canvass increases, however, his personal life deteriorates into a downward spiral of mental illness. Throughout the tumultuous phases of his life, however, one constant remains; his fundamental belief in the beauty of the world around him and his inherent need to capture that beauty on canvass.

Although the film follows the standard biography format it stands apart from other biopics in its complex approach to its subject. While many biopics will glorify a subject and minimize their flaws Lust for Life maintains a firm focus upon van Gogh the man rather than van Gogh the artistic icon. As a result, the script’s van Gogh is a man audiences can immediately relate to and sympathize with as he struggles against everyday obstacles ranging from unrequited love, to mounting debt, to his inability to launch a successful career. The portrayal of the artist’s often fraught personal relationships particularly resonate in their refusal to present him as either a victim or a villain. Similarly, his struggles with mental illness are rendered with a surprisingly modern sensitivity and nuance. Perhaps the script’s greatest strength is its emphasis upon van Gogh’s work and the dazzling visuals which highlight the sources of inspiration surrounding him. In this way, the film brings the world of the artist to vivid life while reminding viewers why his work has continued to endure into the twenty-first century.

No one paints the town red quite like an artist

The uniformly excellent work of the film’s cast brings the world of van Gogh to vibrant life. Kirk Douglas is a revelation in his layered portrayal of the complex, contradictory, and all too human artist. Anthony Quinn is a force of nature as van Gogh’s brash colleague and rival Paul Gaugin. Pamela Brown perfectly captures the world weariness that has hardened van Gogh’s prostitute love interest, Christine. James Donald and Toni Gerry keep the often larger than life van Gogh grounded as his understanding brother and sister-in-law.

Through its subtle portrayal of the complex personal and professional tapestry of van Gogh’s tumultuous existence Lust for Life breathes vital life into its historical subject. As an apt portrait of both van Gogh the artist and van Gogh the man the film is a true work of art. Through its compelling script and engaging performances the film brings the life and times of van Gogh to the screen with all the vibrancy and emotion of one of his paintings. For a true cinematic masterpiece look no further than Lust for Life.

Studios are for slackers

Classics: A Review of To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar By Lauren Ennis

Three friends, thousands of miles, and one national drag competition; what could possibly go wrong? It is this very question that is the premise of the 1995 cult classic To Wong Foo, Thanks For Everything! Julie Newmar. The film hilariously follows the hijinks that three very different New York drag queens find themselves in when they hit the open road only to be stranded in the heart of the midwest. While time has made the story’s shenanigans more sweet than subversive, the film’s humor remains every bit as infectious as the day that it reached number one at the box office. For a frothy cocktail of friendship, laughter, and compassion viewers can thank the film’s stars, Patrick Swayze, Wesley Snipes, and John Leguizamo…and maybe Wong Foo.

The story begins with drag queens Vida Boheme (Patrick Swayze) and Noxeema Jackson (Wesley Snipes) tying for first place in the “Drag Queen of the Year” competition, winning a trip to Hollywood to compete in the “Miss Drag Queen of America” pageant. Along the way they meet inexperienced and despondent would-be drag queen Chi Chi Rodriguez (John Leguizamo). Vida, determined to help Chi Chi reach her full drag queen potential, takes Chi Chi under her wing and persuades Noxeema to let the newcomer join them on their trip. The three form a fast friendship that is quickly tested when their car breaks down, stranding them in an ultra-conservative Midwestern town. The trio then embark upon an adventure that is equal parts hilarious and heartwarming as they teach the residents lessons in tolerance, empowerment, and pizzazz.

Through its fish out of water tale the film confronts viewers with vital lessons in tolerance and empowerment without missing a single comedic beat. The focus upon its three heroines provided 1990’s viewers with an, empathetic if exaggerated, glimpse into the LBGT community. While the film was a far cry from the heavy hitting dramas that would tackle this subject in the future, it still succeeded in shedding light upon a community that film and television had largely ignored. The film particularly stands out for the depth with which each of its very different leading ladies is portrayed, as each struggles with her own search for her place in the world without falling into stereotypes or caricature. As a result, the film’s portrayal of its leads as admirable, likeable, and relatable characters acts as an apt call to tolerance without reducing the script to heavy-handedness or lecturing. Similarly, the film aptly portrays the struggle of modern women as the local ladies that our heroines encounter are continually faced with the limits of gender roles, sexual harassment, and domestic abuse. While the inclusion of these obstacles highlighted vital social issues, the film is at its most empowering when Vida, Noxeema, and Chi Chi embrace their own unique selves and inspire their new friends to do the same. In this way, the film encourages viewers to not only strive beyond their own limits but to also help those around them do the same. Thus, while its story may be slapstick on the surface, To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar is a film with crucial messages that will resonate long after the laughs fade.

The films shines thanks to the brilliant work of its cast. Jason London is endearing in his chivalrous turn as Chi Chi’s small-town admirer, Bobby Ray. Stockard Channing imbues her role as abused housewife Carol Anne with an essential resilience and sympathy. Jennifer Milmore is a delight as Carol Anne’s sheltered daughter, Bobbie Leigh. Chris Penn is an ideal villain in his equal parts bumbling and brutal portrayal of bigoted Sheriff Dollard. Even in the midst of stellar supporting performances, however, the film’s crowning achievements belong to Swayze, Snipes, and Leguizamo who carry their unusual roles with infectious charm. Wesley Snipes is superb in his role as sassy Noxeema as he plays her cynical persona and inner idealism with equal aplomb. John Leguizamo infuses sultry Chi Chi with particular depth as he portrays her struggles to navigate both the drag subculture, and her fraught love life. Patrick Swayze brings Vida to vibrant life as he imbues her every larger than life action and gesture with just the right dash of 1990s girl power.

As one of the most wonderfully whimsical films of the 1990’s To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar more than earns its status as a cult classic. Through its by turns slapstick and heartfelt script and engaging performances the film is guaranteed to leave you with a smile on your face. Hit the road with Vida, Noxeema, and Chi Chi for a viewing experience that you will be sure to thank yourself for.

Classics: A Review of Lilo and Stitch By Lauren Ennis

After nearly a century of animated adventures Walt Disney Studios has become synonymous with the magic of childhood. While the studio is best remembered for its beloved, but often formulaic tales of larger than life heroes and beautiful princesses the studio has also released numerous more original, if less renowned, efforts. One of the studio’s most unique but unfortunately unsung releases is the endearingly offbeat tale of an eccentric girl and her unusual pet; 2002’s Lilo and Stitch. At once a break with the conventions that the studio is best known for and a return to its roots, Lilo and Stitch is an ode to childhood that puts the ‘family’ in ‘family film’.

Ohana means family; family means nobody gets left behind or forgotten

The story starts with a truly out of this world beginning as an inter-galactic council decides the fate of genetic experiment number 626; a furry weapon of mass destruction gone adorably awry. The council ultimately sentences 626’s creator to prison while 626 himself is placed on death row. Fortunately for viewers if not for the council, 626 is far more resourceful than his wide eyes would suggest, and he quickly escapes to the distant planet earth.  After crash landing in Hawaii, 626 bides his time hiding in an animal shelter where he is mistaken for a dog. Meanwhile, unconventional young Lilo and her older sister, Nani, struggle to cope with the recent deaths of their parents. When Lilo’s oddball behavior derails the pair’s interview with a street-smart social worker, Nani desperately searches for a way to manage her sister and make their empty house back into a home. This search ultimately leads the sisters to the local animal shelter where Lilo immediately attaches herself to its most notorious animal; none other than 626 whom she dubs ‘Stitch’. The unlikely trio then embark upon an series of madcap adventures as Stitch tries to stay one step ahead of galactic bounty-hunters while Lilo and Nani struggle to win over their social worker. Over the course of the film both Lilo and Stitch take a journey into the deepest depths of the human heart as they learn the true meaning of family.

Released between the end of the ‘Disney Renaissance’ of the 1990’s and the rise of Pixar’s now dominant computer animation, Lilo and Stitch arrived at a time when Disney had reached a crucial crossroads. When the fairytale formula that the studio had come to rely upon began to lose its luster the studio was forced to re-evaluate its position in a changing market. During this period of transition the studio needed to find a way to break new ground without alienating its established fan base. In an effort to strike this difficult balance the studio looked both ahead to the futuristic adventures of sci-fi while simultaneously seeking inspiration from some of its own pre-1990’s classics. The result was a film that remains unlike anything else in the Disney cannon.



I bet Lassie doesn't have those moves

The film’s greatest strength lies in the way in which it takes the familiar Disney elements that fans know and love and subverts them into something entirely unique. For example the use of traditional watercolor animation brilliantly captures the lush landscapes of modern Hawaii, while harkening back to such pre-computer studio classics as Dumbo. Simultaneously, however, the animators also lend the visuals a refreshingly modern twist through the character designs, with heroines who have realistic proportions and curves that are a stark departure from the studio’s Barbie-esque princesses. Similarly, the plot merges both the old and new by juxtaposing the science fiction action of Stitch’s adventure with the timeless tale of a lonely child and her pet to create a story that will have something for the entire family. Even the film’s soundtrack, a toe-tapping blend of modern Hawaiian and classic Elvis, adds a unique dynamic as it transports viewers into the characters’ world and mentality (grieving Lilo seeks solace in the music of her hero, Elvis), while breaking with Disney’s tradition of Broadway style show-tunes. The script’s greatest departure from studio tradition lends the film its most endearing aspect; the depth and realism of its characters. Unlike traditional Disney characters who were designed to provide young viewers with idealized role models, Lilo, Stitch, and Nani are characters who children can relate to rather than merely aspire to. While all of the characters prove likeable, each possesses flaws and quirks, which in turn keeps their often outlandish journey grounded in realism. As a result, viewers will be bound to see many of their own experiences reflected in misunderstood Lilo, stressed-out Nani, and destructive Stitch, and can easily find inspiration in the characters’ eventual triumphs. Originally advertised as Disney’s ‘black sheep’, this story of a girl and her ‘dog’ gleefully dances to the beat of its own ukulele, earning it a place amongst the best in American animation.

Easily one of the most original films released by Disney, Lilo and Stitch is an ode to anyone who couldn’t fit in because they were born to stand out. Through its breathtaking animation, infectious music, and engaging voice performances, the film weaves a fantastic tale that pays apt tribute to the best Disney classics while still breaking new ground in family animation. For an animated adventure with a little more action, join Lilo and Stitch for a truly out of this world animation experience that is guaranteed to satisfy.

Now that is what I call a rockin' soundtrack

Classics: A Review of Sons of Liberty By Lauren Ennis

This July 4^th will mark two-hundred and forty two years since the Declaration of Independence was signed and a new republic was born. In recognition and celebration of the innovations and sacrifices of our founders, this week I’ll be turning the spotlight on a miniseries that puts the rebel in rebellion; 2015’s Sons of Liberty. Easily one of the grittiest portrayals of colonial America, the series chronicles the events leading up to the American Revolution with all of the suspense, romance, and raw emotion that your history class left out.

The original Boston Strong

The story begins with Boston in a state of upheaval as the streets descend into poverty, gang violence, and a crime epidemic under the by turns indifferent and brutal rule of colonial England. Amidst this tumult, local tax collector Sam Adams (Ben Barnes) attempts to help those in need by using his own limited funds to pay the tax debts of friends and local business owners. Despite his good intentions, Adams’ attempts at philanthropy leave him unable to pay his own taxes, leading the British authorities to issue a warrant for his arrest. When his failed arrest prompts a riot that destroys the governor’s mansion, he quickly finds himself the unlikely center of a local movement. Meanwhile, local businessman John Hancock (Rafe Spall), Sam’s cousin, lawyer John Adams (Henry Thomas), and Doctor Joseph Warren (Ryan Eggold) each find themselves at a crossroads as events unfold that force each of them to question the status quo and choose which side of history they want to be on.

When the series debuted, the History Channel promoted it with the tagline; “there’s the revolution you know. And the one that’s about to begin”. Through its unique approach the series more than lived up to its promotion by providing an insider’s look at the conflicted and complicated men behind the American Revolution. In this way, the series helps breathe new life into the events of 1776 in a way that highlights just what was so revolutionary about the ideals that the colonists were fighting for. Critics and historians rightly cited the series’ tendency to place entertainment value above historical accuracy. The series’ makers defended their work by insisting that their primary goal was to capture the spirit of the era rather than document it; a goal that they certainly achieved. Although the series more aptly serves as an engaging overview than a history lesson, it aptly portrays brings colonial America to gritty life for a new generation. For a viewing thrill ride that will teach you a few things along the way, ship up to Boston with the Sons of Liberty.

Don't tread on me!

  The cast bring colonial America to vibrant life through their stellar performances. Ben Barnes’ roguishly charming performance transforms Sam Adams into a colonial Robin Hood as he rises up against the British ruling class for his fellow colonists. Rafe Squall is an ideal underdog as reluctant rebel John Hancock, and portrays Hancock’s surprising journey with a nuance that ensures his performance is as believable as it is entertaining. Henry Thomas is a perfect foil to Barnes’ reckless Sam in his turn as Sam’s upright but conflicted cousin, John. Ryan Eggold is a story-book worthy hero in his portrayal of noble Doctor Warren. Martin Csokas is an ideal villain in his portrayal of chillingly brutal British general Thomas Gage. Emily Berrington infuses her role as Gage’s battered wife turned Warren’s illicit love interest, Margaret, with an intelligence and spunk that will endear her to audiences as much as they do to the good doctor.

Sons of Liberty aptly brings the American Revolution to life with a modern flair. Through its gritty portrayal of the events leading up to the revolution the series provides viewers with essential insight into the founding fathers’ motives, sacrifices, and truly revolutionary ideas. The series’ combination of an intelligent script and engaging performances will leave even those who hated history class wanting more. For a mini-series that puts the drama in historical drama settle down for a Boston-style tea party with the Sons of Liberty.

Oh say does that star-spangled banner yet wave...

Classics: A Review of An American Rhapsody By Lauren Ennis

One generation’s sacrifices and hopes all too often prove to be the restraints and burdens of another. This is particularly true in immigrant families, as the traditions and struggles of one generation collide with the aspirations of another. The universal clash between parents and children is explored with particular poignancy in the 2001 drama An American Rhapsody. Although inspired by the real-life experiences of director Eva Gardos and her parents, who fled the oppression of life behind the Iron Curtain, An American Rhapsody is a universal tale of identity and family that will resonate with children and parents alike.

Get the hankies ready

The story begins in 1950’s Budapest as Margit (Natassja Kinski) and Peter Sandor (Tony Goldwyn) plan to escape from Soviet-occupied Hungary with their two young daughters. When their plan goes heart-wrenchingly awry, Margit’s mother is imprisoned for her role in aiding the family’s escape and the couple’s youngest daughter, Suzanne, is left behind to be raised by a couple in the Hungarian countryside. Although Margit and Peter maintain contact with Suzanne’s foster family, she spends her first six years largely unaware of her biological family’s existence. After years of struggling, Margit and Peter are finally reunited with their daughter in the United States, but the reunion proves far more complicated than anyone anticipated as Suzanne continues to long for the only life and family that she has ever known. Cultures and generations clash as Suzanne grows into a rebellious teenager and continues to reject her biological family, who she can neither understand nor forgive. When tensions between mother and daughter finally bring the family to their breaking point, Suzanne makes a life-altering journey back to Hungary where she uncovers vital truths about both of her families and herself.

An American Rhapsody follows in the tradition of such family dramas as The Joy Luck Club and The Namesake in its tale of one family’s struggle to bridge the gap between drastically different cultures and generations. The film aptly portrays the oppression that the Sandors face in Communist Hungary, where they lose their successful publishing company to the control of the state and loved ones to the horrors of the gulags. The film avoids the trap of idealizing the family’s new life in the U.S., however, by depicting their struggles to fit into their new home amidst the conformity and anti-communist sentiments of 1950’s America with equal skill.  The script cleverly juxtaposes the gritty reality of Peter and Margit’s Budapest with the idealized childhood fantasy of Hungary that Suzanne nostalgically longs for. Simultaneously, the film also conveys the family’s very different perceptions of their new home, which Peter and Margit view as the land of opportunity and Suzanne sees as a gilded prison. Through its dual perspectives the film aptly conveys the complex reality of the family’s unusual situation, in which there are no easy answers amidst years of misunderstandings and missed opportunities. It is through this subtle portrayal of cultural and generational conflict that An American Rhapsody relates a tale which is sure to resonate with children and parents across America and beyond.

Back in the USSR...

Through its uniformly excellent performances, the film weaves a tapestry of love and heartache that spans across cultures and generations. Natassja Kinski turns in an achingly real performance as she captures Margit’s longing for the daughter who remains just beyond her reach. Tony Goldwyn aptly portrays Peter’s internal conflict as he struggles to build and maintain a better life for his family amidst personal and political tumult. Zsuzsa Czinkoczi and Balazs Galko are the personification of a loving family in their by turns endearing and anguished performances as the couple who love Suzanne as their own, only to ultimately lose her to her biological family. Scarlett Johannsen perfectly captures Suzanne’s angst and alienation as she grows from a confused and lonely child into a willful and headstrong teen. The supporting cast provide equally strong performances that are engaging from the film’s opening credits to its final fade.

At once a deeply personal story of one family and a universal tale of family life, An American Rhapsody is essential viewing for the entire family. Through its intelligent script and emotionally engaging performances the film captures the conflicts that threaten to break families apart and the love that binds them together. For a viewing experience that will take you inside the complex and contradictory rhapsody that is a family tune in to An American Rhapsody.

Not so different after all

Classics: Another Memorial Day Salute By Lauren Ennis

Originally a Southern event designated to honor Confederate veterans of the Civil War, Memorial Day went on to become a nationally recognized holiday in the United States, which now honors all American veterans. While today the true meaning of the holiday is too often lost amidst the barbeques, beach days, and block parties that it has since become associated with, it remains at its heart a commemoration of the bravery and sacrifice of our men and women in uniform. Below are three films that celebrate and honor America’s men and women in arms and all that they stand for.

You say you want a revolution...

The Patriot: The best place to start with America’s military history is at the beginning, and the 2000 historical war drama The Patriot does just that through its wrenching tale of one man’s struggle to protect his family amidst the American Revolution. The story begins with emotionally scarred French and Indian War veteran Benjamin Martin (Mel Gibson) attempting to maintain neutrality in an increasingly conflicted world. While his war-time trauma and the death of his wife leave Benjamin determined that his family remain safely out of the bloody events surrounding them, his pacifism places him in direct conflict with his headstrong eldest son, Gabriel (Heath Ledger). Benjamin is eventually forced to choose sides when Gabriel defies him by enlisting in the Continental Army and is later arrested. The arrest sets off a brutal chain of events that ultimately lead father and son on a quest for more than mere revenge as they devote themselves to the colonies’ struggle for independence. Following in the footsteps of Mel Gibson’s earlier hit, Braveheart, the film portrays the harrowing reality of war and the heavy price paid by those caught in the cross-fire. In this way, the film not only pays homage to the courage of the Continental Army and its supporters, but also serves as an apt tribute to the sacrifices that they made in their pursuit of freedom. Perhaps the film’s greatest strength is its morally conflicted approach, which emphasizes the plight of the colonies under British rule without glorifying the gruesome reality of their fight for independence.  While the film serves as much to entertain as to educate it provides viewers with an introduction to the American Revolution and brings the historical events it portrays to life with equal parts gritty realism and emotional resonance. For a revolutionary way to honor Memorial Day look no further than The Patriot.

It's the eye of the tiger, it's the thrill of the fight...

Glory: The American Civil War is most often portrayed on-screen as the struggle between north and south over the abolition of slavery. What such narratives all too often fail to acknowledge, however, is the role that African-Americans played in the fight for emancipation. The 1989 film Glory, presents a more complex portrayal of the Civil War from the unique perspective of an all-black regiment and their abolitionist leader. Inspired by a true story, the film follows the real life 54^th Regiment Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry, one of the Union Army’s first all-black regiments, as they face adversity both on and off the battlefield. The film begins with Boston abolitionist Captain Robert Gould Shaw (Matthew Broderick) being promoted to the rank of colonel for valor at Antietam and receiving orders to lead the 54^th regiment. To the credit of the film’s writers, the script approaches the characters as an ensemble cast, giving full weight to the men who comprised the regiment rather than merely focusing upon Shaw’s leadership. The film is made up of a variety of three-dimensional performances rather than mere types, with standout performances from Matthew Broderick as Shaw, Morgan Freeman as insightful John Rawlins, and Denzel Washington as rebellious Silas Tripp. The film relates a more complicated tale than most war movies as it portrays its heroes’ efforts to struggle against racial discrimination in their own army in the midst of their larger battle against the Confederacy. The film is made even more complex by its bittersweet ending, as the majority of the regiment ultimately fall in the assault on Fort Wagner even as their valor prompts the Union Army to accept the enlistment of thousands of African-American soldiers. Through its engaging performances and intelligent script the film offers more than a mere history lesson and serves as a solemn tribute to the soldiers of the 54^th regiment and those who followed after them.



Some of the grittiest stuff this side of 1950

The Best Years of Our Lives: While war dramas have graced cinema screens since the silent era, few films capture struglle that soldiers continue to face after the gunfire stops quite like The Best Years of Our Lives. Released in the immediate wake of World War II, The Best Years of Our Lives stands out from the plethora of war films released in its era for is stark portrayal of lingering trauma. The film follows three soldiers as they return to civilian life in the same Midwestern town while they continue to grapple with the traumas that they have suffered. The script aptly portrays the ways in which the war impacted people of all walks of life as middle-aged banker Al (Frederic March) returns home to a family who no longer know him, ambitious Fred (Dana Andrews) wrestles with both the plummeting job market and his broken marriage, and former high school athlete Homer (Harold Russell) adjusts to life with a disability after losing both hands in combat. The script approaches each of its characters and their individual journeys with an essential sensitivity and subtlety that provides apt insight into the trials of soldiers returning home not just from World War II but from every war. The film particularly stands out for its refusal to follow the propaganda film trends of its era in its focus upon the heavy price of freedom rather than limiting itself to the Allied victory. For one of the most emotionally resonant and honest film going experiences of your life look no further than The Best Years of Our Lives.

Classics: A Review of Notorious By Lauren Ennis

Nazi war criminals, jaded FBI agents, sultry playgirls, and a champagne bottle bubbling over with uranium mix nicely in Alfred Hitchcock’s 1946 thriller Notorious. By combining the elements of the salacious Mata Hari legend with the horrors of World War II, Hitchcock crafted a thriller that highlighted America’s lingering fears in the aftermath of World War II while simultaneously predicting the moral dilemmas and paranoia of the Cold War. At once a mind-bending thriller and a spy story with a soul, the film’s subversive script and uniformly superb performances elevate what easily could have been a standard espionage tale to classic status.

And they were big pimpin' in the 1940's

The story begins with FBI agent T.R. Devlin (Cary Grant) receiving orders to recruit the self-destructive daughter (Ingrid Bergman) of a notorious Nazi war criminal into government service. What begins as a standard assignment quickly spirals into a moral and ethical quandary as he finds himself falling for damaged party-girl Alicia. Just as Alicia begins to pick up the pieces of her shattered life, however, she learns the sordid nature of her assignment; to seduce one of her father’s former associates and fellow war criminals (Claude Rains) who is now living a charmed existence in Rio de Janeiro. What ensues is a tale of love, lust, betrayal, and redemption that takes viewers into the murky world of post-war intelligence and the darkest depths of the human heart.

While Notorious does contain staples of the espionage genre, what sets the film apart is the way in which it utilizes these familiar elements to explore the political and ethical questions of its day. At the film’s start the story’s moral lines seem clearly drawn as honorable federal agent Devlin offers disgraced Alicia a chance at redemption. As the story continues, however, the characters’ ethics become as convoluted as the spy games that they are engaging in as damaged Alicia becomes the film’s emotional center. Rather than focusing upon the greater good goal of her mission, the script frankly portrays Alicia’s assignment ass government endorsed prostitution with Devlin her reluctant pimp. This approach, while accurate, was nothing short of subversive in the tense atmosphere of the post-war era as the film called the war-time actions of allied governments into direct question. The film consistently maintains its political stance as its shows Alicia experience disillusionment, betrayal, and abandonment at the hands of the very government organization that claimed to protect and redeem her. The film even goes so far as to draw parallels between the brutal and deceptive methods of the ex-Nazi’s Alicia is infiltrating with the questionable counter-intelligence methods utilized by the FBI.

Explosive liquor; a surefire way to start your night off with a bang

Beyond its sharp political criticism, the film also offers social commentary through its portrayal of the twisted love triangle between Devlin, Alicia, and her mark turned husband, Alex. While Devlin is initially presented as the story’s hero, his treatment of Alicia is hardly knight in shining armor material as he constantly judges and berates her for her vices. At first glance, his attitude could be dismissed as understandable given her behavior and the norms of the era. The fact that he continues to malign her even after learning of her efforts to stop her father’s fascist activities and that she uses her vices to escape the guilt of failing to do so is nothing less than cruel. The script goes on to portray him in an even more negative light when he tasks her with selling herself under federal orders after previously chastising her for her promiscuity. His hypocrisy, and the film’s biting criticism of it, reaches its peak when Alicia reluctantly agrees to her assignment only to be confronted with rejection and condemnation from Devlin when she succeeds. In an interesting contrast, the film’s villain, Alex, is portrayed as understanding and tolerant when he not only pursues a relationship with but marries Alicia with full knowledge of her past. In its sympathetic portrayal of Alicia and its exploration of her relationships with the two very different men in her life, Notorious highlights the hypocrisies of sexual double standards in a way that few Hays Code era films would have dared. Through its scathing social and political commentary the film raises challenging questions that remain startlingly relevant today.

The film continues to thrill audiences thanks in large part to the stellar work of its cast. Claude Raines portrays Alex with a humanity and complexity that make him a surprisingly sympathetic villain. Leopoldine Konstantin rivals Hitchcock’s other infamously evil mother, Mrs. Bates, in her wonderfully wicked role as Alex’s oppressive mother. Cary Grant makes for an impressive anti-hero in a performance that combines his characteristic charm with an underlying bitterness and menace. Ingrid Bergman inhabits the outwardly tough but inwardly vulnerable Alicia in a way that will leave viewers as susceptible to her charms as Raines’ and Grant’s characters.

Easily one of the most intelligent films to tackle international intelligence, Notorious is another masterful effort from the master of suspense. At once a tale of political intrigue and a powerful political criticism, the film is far more than just another spy story. Through its gripping script and uniformly excellent performances the film weaves a twisting web of suspense and deceit that will leave viewers guessing until its final frame. With its scathing social commentary and subversive take on post-war politics Hitchcock’s 1946 hit remains Notorious.

 

Classics: The Formidable Females of Disney By Lauren Ennis

Since the 1937 premiere of Snow White and the Seven Dwarves Walt Disney Studios has become synonymous with excellence in family entertainment. The studio has faced criticism in recent years, however, regarding its depiction of female characters with modern critics accusing the studio of promoting outdated and sexist values. While many of the studio’s earlier efforts reflect the traditional values of the eras in which they were released, the studio has also created numerous heroines who are every bit as complex, clever, and capable as their male counterparts. This week, I’ll be shining the spotlight on three Disney ladies who personify what it means to fight like a girl.

I ain't afraid of no huns

Mulan: Joan of Arc had the Lord to guide her, she was a sister who really cooked, and then there’s Mulan. In the 1998 film Mulan, the title heroine defies both her family and the whole of society when she joins in China’s fight against the invading Huns. At the film’s start she resigns herself to the restrictive role society has assigned to her and prepares to enter an arranged marriage. Despite her best efforts, however, her unconventional personality shines through, leading the local matchmaker to deem her ‘unmarriageable’. She soon finds good use for her tomboyish lack of proprietary, however, when the emperor orders the conscription of one man from each household. To save her elderly father from the perils of battle she disguises herself as a man and enlists in his place. She then overcomes numerous physical and emotional challenges while shouldering the additional burden of concealing her identity, eventually becoming one of the best soldiers in her regiment. Just as her mission nears success, however, she faces ostracism once again when she is wounded in battle and her true identity is revealed. Despite being dishonorably discharged, she refuses to abandon her comrades and re-joins her regiment just in time to save China.

While Mulan’s deeds on the battlefield are the stuff of legend, it is her selflessness, humbleness, and resilience that make her an ideal role model. Throughout the film she dedicates herself to helping others both on and off the battlefield. It is this self-sacrifice that first prompts her to enlist and later leads her to return to her regiment even after her comrades reject her. As a result, her actions display heroism in its truest sense as she repeatedly risks her reputation and safety not for any personal glory or recognition, but to ensure the safety of her family and country. While she regularly faces physical dangers, it is her emotional resilience that holds greater resonance. Throughout the film she faces criticism from those around her, but rather than crumble she uses this criticism to motivate herself to succeed. Throughout her journey she also retains a sense of humbleness as she allows neither her fame nor her success to cloud her judgment. For a girl worth fighting alongside hop into the saddle with Mulan.

That slight come hither stare, it's witchcraft...

Esmeralda: When she first appears at the Festival of Fools Esmeralda is described as “the finest girl in France” and after one viewing of The Hunchback of Notre Dame you won’t have to wonder why. While she may not be a historic heroine or princess like many other Disney heroines, she is easily one of the most original and complex protagonists in all of Disney. At the film’s start she is struggling to earn a living as a dancer on the streets of Paris. When a group of soldiers harass her and accuse her of stealing the money that she legally earned, she refuses to tolerate either their accusations or racist taunts and defends herself despite the consequences. She later displays even more courage when she defends complete stranger Quasimodo against the wrath of the local mob for no reason other than because it is the right thing to do. She doesn’t stop at freeing Quasimodo from his attackers, however, as she then goes on to denounce both the mob for their abusive behavior and corrupt judge Claude Frollo for failing to hold them accountable. She continues to show compassion towards Quasimodo when she sets out to befriend him and teaches him to believe in himself when others shun him for his appearance. When her defiance inspires a fascination in Frollo that spirals into lustful obsession she repeatedly rejects his lecherous advances despite the power and influence that he possesses and threatens to use against her. Even when confronted with the terrible choice of offering herself to Frollo or facing execution she refuses to compromise her own values and submit to him. Throughout the film she is derided for her race, her profession, and her non-conformity, and yet she never loses sight of the fact that there are still others less fortunate then her. In a particularly poignant moment the script goes so far as to show that even in her prayers she puts others first when she says, “I ask for nothing, I can get by. But I know so many less lucky than I”. While Frollo may describe her as a witch sent by the devil himself, Esmeralda consistently displays a moral courage, selflessness, and sense of justice that are nothing short of angelic. For a character living in the 15^th century she possesses all the intelligence and independence of the most modern of women. From the moment that she whirls onto the screen Esmeralda dances to the beat of her own tambourine, providing an example that we could all aspire to.

Real women read

Belle: She’s a beauty but a funny girl that Belle, and the Beast and viewers alike love her all the more for it. Many consider Beauty and the Beast’s bookish heroine to be Disney’s first modern princess. Unlike her predecessors, Belle longs not for a prince, but instead to find her own place in the world. While the other girls in her small town are ready to settle down and start a family she remains determined to find something more beyond the confines of her ‘provincial life’. As a result, while the other girls in town are charmed by local ladies’ man Gaston, Belle rejects his repeated proposals without hesitation. She also admirably stays true to herself by pursuing the intellectual interests that make her a subject of constant gossip and speculation. Even as she maintains her independence, however, she still dedicates herself to helping others, especially her father. When the townspeople routinely mock Maurice for his forward thinking and accuse him of suffering from mental illness Belle remains firmly by her father’s side. After he disappears on his way to a nearby inventor’s fair she springs into action without hesitation and sets out alone to find him. Later, when she learns that her father is being held captive at the Beast’s castle she makes the ultimate sacrifice by offering to take Maurice’s place as the Beast’s prisoner. Even when confronted with the daunting reality of her new life as a prisoner in an enchanted castle she refuses to fall into despair and instead makes the best of her situation by forming bonds with the household staff. Despite her confined status, she also continues to assert herself in her relationship with the Beast  by insisting that he treat her with respect and learn to control his temper. Even in her relationship with the Beast, however, she displays loyalty and selflessness. This is first shown when she stays at the castle to make sure that the Beast receives medical care after he is injured, when she easily could have used his injury to her advantage and escaped. Belle proves her loyalty and kindness once again when she pleads with the Beast to free her in order to tend to her ailing father, but returns just in time to help the Beast in his battle against Gaston. Over the course of her fantastic adventure she overcomes overwhelming obstacles with an intelligence and ferocity that rivals those of any Disney hero. Whether she’s facing local gossip, enchanted spells, or villainous schemes Belle maintains a fundamental grace, selflessness, and optimism that make her a true beauty both inside and out.

Classics: A Review of The Death of Stalin By Lauren Ennis

History and Hollywood are overflowing with tales of tyrants who dominated through brutality, repression, and manipulation. What is less widely discussed is what happens when a tyrant’s reign of terror is finally brought to an end. The 2018 dark satire The Death of Stalin explores the outrageous ways that the most elite members of the Soviet government sought to obtain and maintain control in the wake of dictator Joseph Stalin’s sudden death in 1953. At once a slapstick spoof of the corrupting influence of politics and an indictment of the all too real horrors that ran rampant in the Soviet Union, The Death of Stalin is a film that is certain to slay you.

Is anyone going to acknowledge the red elephant in the room?!

The story begins with a darkly ironic glimpse into the daily absurdities of life in the Soviet Union as a Moscow orchestra scrambles to recreate a concert performance in order to appease Stalin’s whim for a recording. Through this opening depiction of the hysterical levels of fear that the mere mention of Stalin inspires in the musicians the film perfectly captures the Orwellian nightmare that was everyday life under Stalin’s rule. The film then shifts its focus from the populace that the dictator brutalized into submission to the political cronies and henchmen who enabled his reign to endure. Following a brief introduction to the sycophancy and underhandedness that dominated Stalin’s inner circle, the film portrays the dictator’s sudden death from a stroke. The film then quickly spirals into a madcap race against time as the most elite figures in the Soviet Union face off in a power struggle that will define Russian politics for decades to come.

Made in the tradition of such biting political comedies as Ninotchka and The Great Dictator, The Death of Stalin provides a wry look at politics at their most poisonous. From the moment that Stalin is found unconscious in a puddle of his own urine the film morphs into something akin to ‘Survivor: Soviet Moscow’ as the dictator’s closest allies make and break alliances in accordance with the shifting political climate. All the while the wit remains razor sharp and the insults fly faster than a firing squad’s bullets as the USSR’s most elite bumble, bicker, and double-cross their way to the top. The shenanigans that ensue are comic in their absurdity, even as they highlight the brutality, paranoia, and hysteria that dominate life under repressive regimes. The film wisely maintains its darkly comic focus upon the hapless schemers jockeying to take Stalin’s place, rather than the ordinary citizens caught in the crossfire. As a result, the film functions as a scathing indictment of the lunacy that was Stalinism rather than a tasteless dismissal of its millions of victims. Although the central players are historical figures, the power plays that they ruthlessly engage in remain as startlingly relevant today as they were during the height of the Cold War.

Stay tuned to see who will be voted off the island next

The expert performances of the film’s international cast deftly keep the film balanced between slapstick spoof and historical drama. Steve Buscemi nearly steals the film in his slick turn as Nikita Krushchev, which plays like a Cold War twist on his popular role of Boardwalk Empire’s politician turned gangster Nucky Thompson. Jeffrey Tambor is hilariously inept as the ever one step behind Georgy Malenkov. Jason Isaacs lends roguish charm and plenty of swagger to his role as World War II hero and Red Army chief of staff General Zhukov. Simon Russell Beale manages to be both comic and chilling in his portrayal of notorious head of the secret police Lavrenti Beria. Rupert Friend is wonderfully outrageous in his performance as Stalin’s drunken buffoon son, Vasily. Andrea Riseborough aptly portrays Stalin’s sheltered daughter, Svetlana with an appropriate combination of snobbishness and naïveté.

A historical tale that could easily be ripped from today’s headlines, The Death of Stalin is simultaneously one of the most comic and tragic films of the year. Through its wickedly witty script the film sheds light onto the comically absurd events that transpired after Stalin’s death, while also reminding audiences of the millions who suffered under the rule of Stalin and his cohorts. The ensemble cast turn in expert performances that will have even the most casual students of history laughing out loud. For a film that will have you dying with laughter don’t miss The Death of Stalin.

It's funny because it's mostly true!