Confessions of a Film Junkie: A 2-4-1 Special of “Haunting
in...” Films
By: Brian Cotnoir
Well it’s October; the
month of Halloween. So I decided to
treat you all to a Two-For-One Special of “Haunting In...” Films. Ever since the release of the “Paranormal
Activity” films, there has been a rise of films trying to be just like it. The films that claim to be “Inspired by
Actual Events” that followed an alleged Haunting
that began afflicting the family and how the family eventually overcame the
“Haunting”. We’ve gotten “Paranormal
Entity”, “The Devil Inside”, “Grave Encounters”, “Insidious”, “The Haunting in
Connecticut”, “The Conjuring”, and whole bunch of other films that are trying
to be like “Paranormal Activity”. Once
again, these were all “Inspired by Actual Events”, and while the films may have
been “inspired” by these “actual events”, they typically succumb to typical
Hollywood writing with exaggeration to the plot and a “Happy Ending”. So get ready to listen to me talk about two
“Haunting In...” films that were released in 2013 that I watched. Enjoy.
The Haunting in Connecticut 2: The Ghosts of Georgia
First things first—and
I have to get this off my chest—this is the Worst Title for a Film Ever! The films not even set in Connecticut, nor
does anyone reference the State of Connecticut. So why bother calling it “The
Haunting in Connecticut 2”? To me the
smart thing to do would have been to call the film “The Haunting in
Georgia”. There now that I’ve got that
off my chest, let me talk to y’all about the film.
So I
actually enjoyed “The Haunting in Connecticut” when I first saw it. Growing up my family and I camped a lot in
Eastern Connecticut, and my best friend from college is actually from Connecticut,
so I spent a lot of time there. I
actually got to meet a “Demonologist” (John Zaffis) who came to my College who
actually met with the family who were the inspiration for “The Haunting in
Connecticut”. He showed us pictures of
the house and told us stories about what happened there. “The Haunting Connecticut” was good, but it
wasn’t phenomenal. So when I heard about
this sequel to the film, I assumed it was going to be as bad its title. Well actually, you might be surprised.
So the
film is set in Georgia in 1993 and it follows a family who movies from the big
city in Atlanta out to the country backwoods.
Shortly, after moving to their home the family’s young daughter Heidi
begins to claim that she’s seeing ghosts.
The mother thinks that her daughter just has an over-active imagination,
but her Aunt tells her that she was born with a power that she inherited
through her mom and grandmother; the ability to see ghosts. The family eventually learns that their
property was actually a Station on the “Underground Railroad”, and that the
original landowners, The Gordy’s, were beloved “stationmasters”. However, the families Pastor tells them that
the last member of The Gordy family who owned the property was not a very a
nice man. The longer the family stays on
the property the more and more ghost sightings appear. They are mostly ghosts of old slaves, but one
night another ghost appears, known as “The Bad Man”, who is trying to make sure
that Heidi’s family doesn’t discover his hidden secret.
Oi vei, he's a baddy! |
So like in “The
Haunting in Connecticut”, most of the scares “The Haunting in Connecticut 2”
are jump scares, and while there aren’t as many in the sequel as there were in
the original, they still managed to make me jump a few times. I actually enjoyed the story in “The Haunting
in Connecticut 2” better than the original.
There was a lot of mystery and great build up to the story; I mean you
could never fully predict what direction the film was going in. It had a pretty dark story, with lots of
mystery, and found it to be very enjoyable.
The acting ranges from mediocre to good, but there wasn’t one actor in
this film that was just awful. If you
enjoyed “The Haunting in Connecticut” than I believe that you will also enjoy
“The Haunting in Connecticut 2: The Ghosts of Georgia”.
A Haunting in Silver Falls
Holy Shnikes! A likable Female Protagonist! :) |
So
I like the character Jordan. She was
very different from what I was expecting.
You know just from her characters background story, you’d expect her to
be the angsty, angry teenager who rebels, and lashes out at everyone who tries
to get close to her because she’s bitter at the world, but she was nothing like
that. Jordan is a very low-maintenance
character. She’s sensible, she’s kind,
she’s appreciative of those who try to help her, and she’s just an all around
likeable character. I have to applaud
the films screenwriter for not writing her as a cliché angsty teenager. This film breaks a lot of clichés that we
typically see in this film genre, and it’s pretty enjoyable at times, but there
was still a lot of aspects in this film that didn’t make sense.
It's...meh. |
It
took some risks, and some of them worked, and others did not. Did I enjoy this film? I thought it was okay, but would I recommend
it, no. I don’t think I would. It’s not the worst thing I’ve seen, but there
are just so many things about it that made me scratch my head, especially
towards the end when the film shows that the director and crew clearly stopped giving
a f*ck and all the questions you had, were left unanswered and left you only
asking more questions.
I’m anxious to see how
long film studios are going to keep pushing out these “Haunting In...” films
that were allegedly inspired by actual
events. How long will studios
continue to try to rip off or outshine “Paranormal Activity”. For every good “Haunting In…” film that
studios release it seems like we’re getting 4 films like “The Conjuring”. The only thing left is to wait this out and
see if this film genre will continue to be dominant or if it is to be the
latest Horror plot cliché.
Good review, hats off to an actually likeable heroine! It seems like this whole trend is a rehash of the same "haunting in" movies in the 70's that ripped off Amityville. But hey, I'll take it over Saw and Human Centipede any day.
ReplyDelete